Why Daniel Farke Paid the Price for Abandoning ‘Farkeball’ at Norwich City

Embed from Getty Images

After a four-and-a-half-year spell at Carrow Road, Daniel Farke has officially been sacked as Norwich boss. Farke, who was plucked from the relative obscurity of Dortmund’s B team by sporting director Stuart Webber, has given Norwich fans two of the best seasons in their history, and two Championship league titles. Nevertheless, Farke’s diminishing faith in his own tactics, companied by a winless start to the 2021-22 season, forced the board above him to bring an end to his reign in Norfolk.

Patience a virtue for Daniel’s ‘Farkeball’

Embed from Getty Images

The heartbeat of the Canaries’ success under Farke was the implementation of a high-octane, high-pressing 4-2-3-1 system which fans lovingly labelled ‘Farkeball’. It was heavily influenced by two attack-minded full backs, providing the width to enable the three forward-thinking midfielders to roam inside and do their damage between the lines. It took time for ‘Farkeball’ to develop. In Farke’s first season, Norwich finished a lowly 14th in the Championship – behind their bitter rivals Ipswich. Nevertheless, the data suggested the style of play was steadily emerging. The following year, Farke’s troops had the fourth-highest average possession statistics and the third-highest pass completion percentage. They immediately won promotion to the Premier League, and Farkeball in its purest form was born.

The ‘2’ midfielders in the Farkeball system were also heavily relied upon for their positional maturity. With the fullbacks given freedom to attack, the holding midfielders were required to provide a block for the central defence, forcing teams to play wide rather than through them. In Oliver Skipp, Norwich had a capable midfielder in helping cover and sweep up any messes in behind last season, that they no longer have this season. At the other end of the pitch, Farke’s playmakers like Mario Vrancic and Emi Buendia have, over time, expertly assumed the mantle of threading assists between the lines for Teemu Pukki to flourish and notch 69 goals in 131 City appearances. With a high defensive line, the ‘Farkeball’ system enabled Norwich to suffocate many teams at Championship level, earning them two deserved automatic promotions under the German.

The Canaries are the only self-funded club in the Premier League. Although self-funded isn’t quite true given their reliance on television money from the Premier League, as with all other top-flight clubs. What the powers that be at Carrow Road really mean is that they do not have a wealthy benefactor pumping money into the club. Majority shareholders Delia Smith and husband Michael Wynn-Jones have a personal wealth of £23 million, which is a drop in the ocean compared with the likes of Newcastle’s new consortium, valued at £320 billion. It’s no surprise that Norwich are often heralded for their sustainable approach, with the sale of last season’s talisman Emi Buendia to Aston Villa funding many of Daniel Farke’s transfers in the summer. But much of that money would have also needed to go back into COVID-19 repairs, and the club would not have been able to fund transfers to the same extent as previous years. ESPN reporter Mark Ogden recently described even the “best-run clubs” in the top-flight as being “driven to extinction”. Even the Premier League admitted their league is “unsustainable” without the fans flowing through the turnstiles.

So without some of the keys to their success in the Championship, Norwich needed to abandon some of their principles of play and opt for a more defensive style of play. They’ve averaged just 43% possession this season, compared to 50% when they were relegated back in 2019-20. It’s normal that with a drop in quality that a drop in possession would occur, but this seemed far more intentional.

Did Farke lose courage?

Embed from Getty Images

Prior to the 2021/22 Premier League campaign, Norwich sporting director Stuart Webber decided to do things rather differently. The club finished the summer transfer window as the eleventh-highest spenders in European football, attracting promising talents such as Milot Rashica and Christos Tzolis, along with Billy Gilmour and Ozan Kabak on-loan from Chelsea and Schalke 04 respectively. They also added Mathias Normann on loan from FC Rostov, hoping he’d have the legs to anchor the midfield and screen the back-line. Rashica was meant to be a Buendia replacement, despite struggling to establish himself at relegated Werder Bremen last season. Billy Gilmour meanwhile was supposed to fill the boots of Oliver Skipp, but has been completely out of his depths in fulfilling that promise.

The early-season data suggests that ‘Farkeball’ has been well and truly abandoned, certainly after the Canaries’ dismal defeat at the hands of fellow promoted side Watford. Farke had also abandoned his trusty 4-2-3-1 formation in favour of a more defensively minded 3-5-2 system against Leeds, which Marcelo Bielsa’s side still managed to exploit. Their recent 2-1 home loss to Leeds saw them register a pass completion rate of just 68% – their lowest of the season and certainly not what we’ve become accustomed to from Farke’s men. With Farke losing confidence in his own abilities and the players seemingly lacking belief too, it’s little wonder that the team was going increasingly direct. But this mentality shift only resulted in a loss of identity and a loss of quality, as Norwich lost game after game. The timing of Farke’s sacking, coming after the side’s first win of the season, was strange. But the decision from the board seemed inevitable. If Norwich and Stuart Webber are deadly serious about losing their yo-yo tag, the data proves the time is right for a change.


So there it is! A quick analysis of Norwich’s sacking of Daniel Farke. Be sure to check out more of our analyses, and follow on social media via the links below. Thanks for reading and see you soon!

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Analyzing Marco Rose’s time at Borussia Dortmund

Rose had clear attacking intentions and tactical ideologies that he wanted to implement, but few of them seemed to pan out in application. While many individuals consistently performed to the highest level, very few of them gelled together as a cohesive unit, working toward an over-arching tactical plan. Here in lies Rose’s greatest failure. Those who watched Dortmund once in a blue moon were able to see the exact same problem as those who watched Dortmund week in and week out. The Black & Yellows simply played like a team of individuals.

Why Alex Stewart has been an inspiration at Tifo Football

Today marks a sad day – the day that Alex Stewart announced his departure from Tifo Football. Alex has been an inspiration for many in the tactics community, and continues to serve as a reminder of what can be accomplished in the tactics and analytics field. Here is why Alex’s work at Tifo can continue to serve as an inspiration.

Tactical Thinker: Which relegated stars are set to stay in the Prem?

After the conclusion of the Premier League season and the subsequent relegations of Norwich, Watford and Burnley, we ask you to conjure up the players that you would keep in the Premier League next season. Whether it’s likely to happen or not, we want to know who you would take at your club next season, or who you think would excel at a Premier League team in 2022-23. Answer our latest Tactical Thinker below!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s