
The use of probability models in football to calculate Expected Goals, Expected Goals Conceded and Expected Points, have taken off to new heights in recent years – with more fans, coaches, managers and even players paying attention to these hypothetical numbers. Between statistical probability, the actual result, and the expectations for all that has been produced, we analyze how many points each team should have won in each match, based on Expected Points.
GOING DEEPER INTO THE DATA…

Football is a sport where many factors come together, but advanced statistics can argue that a team is more likely to win if they continue to generate more quality chances than their opponents.
The Expected Points (xP) model is based around the Expected Goals (xG) of a match. Once we have the xG of each team, we intricate through a distribution model, what would happen if we simulated the same match thousands of times, getting to know the probability each team would have to win, draw and lose with the same expected goals generated. In this way, we obtain a probability percentage for each team and a value of Expected Points.
HOW xP IS CALCULATED
Expected Points (xP) takes into consideration a team’s underlying numbers in xG and xG against. Teams higher in xP typically have a high xG, and a low xG against. So you may be asking – what is xG?
xG (Expected Goals) takes into consideration the quality of chances in a match, based on several factors – including distance from goal, pressure applied, and the type of shot taken. An absolute worldie that results in a goal, such as Andros’ Townsend’s goal against Manchester City a few years back, may even have an xG of 0.01 – meaning that you would expect that kind of goal to be scored one out of every one hundred times.
After simulating with the distribution model and multiplying each percentage obtained by the value of each sign (win, draw, loss), we obtain the expected points of that match if it happened thousands of times. And therefore, we would obtain a form of deservedness that becomes useful to study at any point in the Premier League season.
Let’s take as an example, the Premier League table until today – February 21, 2022.

| Rank | Team | GP | Goals | Conceded | Pts. |
| 1 | Manchester City | 26 | 63 | 17 | 63 |
| 2 | Liverpool | 25 | 64 | 20 | 57 |
| 3 | Chelsea | 25 | 49 | 18 | 50 |
| 4 | Manchester United | 26 | 44 | 34 | 46 |
| 5 | West Ham | 26 | 45 | 34 | 42 |
| 6 | Arsenal | 23 | 36 | 26 | 42 |
| 7 | Wolverhampton Wanderers | 24 | 23 | 18 | 40 |
| 8 | Tottenham Hotspur | 23 | 31 | 31 | 39 |
| 9 | Brighton & Hove Albion | 25 | 25 | 28 | 33 |
| 10 | Southampton | 25 | 32 | 37 | 32 |
| 11 | Leicester City | 23 | 37 | 43 | 27 |
| 12 | Aston Villa | 24 | 31 | 37 | 27 |
| 13 | Crystal Palace | 25 | 32 | 36 | 26 |
| 14 | Brentford | 26 | 27 | 42 | 24 |
| 15 | Leeds United | 24 | 29 | 50 | 23 |
| 16 | Everton | 23 | 28 | 40 | 22 |
| 17 | Newcastle United | 24 | 26 | 45 | 22 |
| 18 | Watford | 24 | 24 | 43 | 18 |
| 19 | Burnley | 22 | 20 | 29 | 17 |
| 20 | Norwich City | 25 | 15 | 53 | 17 |
If we take into consideration, the xG, xG Conceded, and xPoints, the picture would be different in many cases. As you can see in table 2, the first 4 teams are in a fair position and until now, they have accumulated the points they statistically deserve. The bottom feeders also remain in the same places, with only Everton achieving a significant change. Here is how the table would look based on Expected Points rather than actual points.
| Rank | Teams | Points | xP | Difference |
| 1 | Manchester City | 63 | 60.5 | 0 |
| 2 | Liverpool FC | 57 | 54.2 | 0 |
| 3 | Chelsea | 50 | 45.5 | 0 |
| 4 | Manchester United | 46 | 37.3 | 0 |
| 5 | Arsenal FC | 42 | 36.3 | 0 |
| 6 | West Ham United | 42 | 33.7 | 0 |
| 7 | Brentford | 24 | 32.4 | +7 |
| 8 | Crystal Palace | 26 | 31.1 | +5 |
| 9 | Brighton & Hove Albion | 33 | 30.4 | 0 |
| 10 | Tottenham Hotspur | 39 | 29.6 | -2 |
| 11 | Southampton | 32 | 29.1 | -1 |
| 12 | Everton FC | 22 | 28.4 | +4 |
| 13 | Wolverhampton Wanderers | 40 | 28.1 | -6 |
| 14 | Aston Villa | 27 | 23.7 | -3 |
| 15 | Leicester City | 27 | 22.7 | -3 |
| 16 | Newcastle United | 22 | 22.1 | +1 |
| 17 | Leeds United | 23 | 21.3 | -2 |
| 18 | Watford | 18 | 18.6 | 0 |
| 19 | Burnley | 17 | 18.1 | 0 |
| 20 | Norwich City | 17 | 12.2 | 0 |
As you can see from the table, Brentford, Crystal Palace and Everton are the clubs who have been the most “unlucky”, otherwise known as “underperforming”. On Expected Points, Thomas Frank’s Brentford would be 7th place, above the likes of Spurs, Wolves and Brighton. The example of Wolverhampton Wanderers also provides an interesting case study. Bruno Lage’s Wolves sit in 7th place at this time, but based on Expected Points, they wouldn’t even make the top ten, falling all the way to 13th. Interestingly, Antonio Conte’s Spurs would be tenth, despite their positive performances under the Italian to make up for Nuno’s horrific start.
In addition to xP, a team’s control of the possession, or lack thereof, is another intriguing data source to study. While possession isn’t the be all end all, it typically allows a team the possibility to create more chances, and more chances of a higher quality. By re-organizing the table based on possession, we can attempt to discover whether or not this thought process is in fact true, or a myth.
| Rank | Team | Possession % | Chances | Goals Scored | Conversion Rate |
| 1 | Manchester City | 67% | 227 | 63 | 28% |
| 2 | Liverpool FC | 61% | 227 | 64 | 28% |
| 3 | Brighton & Hove Albion | 57% | 134 | 25 | 19% |
| 4 | Chelsea | 56% | 180 | 49 | 27% |
| 5 | Leeds United | 54% | 112 | 29 | 26% |
| 6 | Manchester United | 52% | 191 | 44 | 23% |
| 7 | Arsenal FC | 52% | 141 | 36 | 26% |
| 8 | Crystal Palace | 51% | 131 | 32 | 24% |
| 9 | Tottenham Hotspur | 49% | 140 | 31 | 22% |
| 10 | Southampton | 49% | 124 | 32 | 26% |
| 11 | West Ham United | 48% | 168 | 45 | 27% |
| 12 | Leicester City | 48% | 129 | 37 | 29% |
| 13 | Wolverhampton Wanderers | 47% | 96 | 23 | 24% |
| 14 | Aston Villa | 46% | 106 | 31 | 29% |
| 15 | Brentford | 45% | 127 | 27 | 21% |
| 16 | Norwich City | 44% | 91 | 15 | 16% |
| 17 | Everton FC | 43% | 121 | 28 | 23% |
| 18 | Watford | 43% | 117 | 24 | 21% |
| 19 | Newcastle United | 41% | 100 | 26 | 26% |
| 20 | Burnley | 39% | 110 | 20 | 18% |
Based on the above possession data, the Premier League table would not vary greatly. Wolverhampton and West Ham drop undeservedly into the bottom half, while Vieira’s Crystal Palace moves into 8th. The biggest leap of all sees Leeds United move into fifth, with Brighton in third. Beyond those outrageous moves, the Premier League table based on possession doesn’t look drastically different from the actual Premier League table. This suggests that possession could be a potentially underrated value, even if it’s not the be all end all – as demonstrated by Leeds and Brighton.
Conclusion
Data analysis in football continues to grow, with xP and xG providing a different way of examining the game, and examining a team’s performance. While these underlying numbers only tell one side of the story, it has to be said that actual point and actual goal data may also only tell one side to the story, and that both metrics can be useful to understanding the context of the game.
Uncovering Hidden Gems in League One Through Statistical Value Betting
League One isn’t just a testing ground for future Premier League stars — it’s also a goldmine for sharp bettors looking to outsmart the bookies. In a division full of tactical variety, unpredictable matchdays, and under-covered storylines, value betting becomes difficult to get right. Bookmakers pour their resources into pricing the Premier League and Championship…
Coaching Newsletter: How to use Wyscout for successful video analysis
Wyscout has become the go-to place for video analysis, scouting & recruitment, and all of the analysis needs for pro clubs and analysts like myself! In this video, I’m going to teach you exactly how I use the platform for my analyses and the work I do for clubs.
How I analyze central midfielders for pro clubs with Role Continuity
In 2022, I established my ‘Role Continuity Evaluation System’, on the basis that players should be assessed by the metrics and traits important to their specific role on the pitch. Through this understanding, players are then classified into what is now 20 different roles, and assessed accordingly to see how they stack up to other…

4 thoughts on “Analyzing the Premier League table based on Expected Points (xP)”