Serie A Observations: Juventus Quick Take Tactical Analysis

Embed from Getty Images

This past weekend, Juventus squared up against fellow Serie A heavyweights, AC Milan, at San Siro for a much-anticipated clash of top-four hopefuls. Despite its potential, the match played out as a midseason stalemate, with players from both sides looking a little listless. But past the lack of goals (or shots on goal in the case of Juventus), the more measured pace of play offers one distinct advantage to viewers: a clear view of formational repositioning based on phase of play. In other words, a game model at work.

On paper, Juventus set up in a 4-4-2. However, Juventus’ shape only resembled a 4-4-2 when out of possession. With the ball, Juventus adapted to the area of the pitch and opposition pressure. In the defensive third, the center backs would split, utilizing the goalkeeper as an additional passing option and allowing the full-backs and wide midfielders to push forward, like a 2-4-4. During this phase, the second striker frequently drops deep to offer a combination option out of pressure. In doing so, the striker looks to find their fullback or central midfielder in space, providing a release from pressure and facilitating ball carrying from the defensive to the mid/attacking third. As part of this transition, Juventus would move as pictured above: left midfielder to forward position, right midfielder to right wing, left back to left wing, striker remains advanced, and second striker roams in playmaker role. These movements result in a final formation in the attacking third of 2-3-5 or 3-2-5 (depending on positioning of the other full-back). 

Embed from Getty Images

After studying these transitional movements, two key takeaways are clear. First, when managers make player selections they should be in the context of their projected model. At its core, these tactics are built on players leaning into their strengths. Fielding two defensively-minded wide midfielders would be nonsensical in a system like this, that demands they offer an attacking threat. Secondly, a football team’s “lineup” remains an analytical oversimplification of the way they play. The average positions of Juventus could have easily been characterized as a 4-2-3-1, 4-3-3, 3-5-2, etc. In fact, many teams in the world will adopt these same attacking positions regardless of published formation, placing players in a manner that meets their unique philosophy, style of play, game model and game-plan. To truly understand a side’s predispositions, a game model incorporating phases and areas of play offers a far more accurate and comprehensive view than where they stand at kickoff.


So there it is! A quick-take tactical analysis from Jeremy Barnes on Juventus’ tactical set-up, and how their game model influences what they do in different thirds. Be sure to check out more of our Serie A analyses, and follow on social media @mastermindsite. Thanks for reading and see you soon!

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

YOU MIGHT ALSO ENJOY…

Khvicha Kvaratskhelia – Player Analysis

Taking the world by storm in 2022-23, Khvicha Kvaratskhelia has come from relative obscurity to join one of Europe’s most famous clubs, and now leads their charge toward the top of Serie A. The direct and dynamic wing wizard has been in remarkable form since joining Napoli from Rubin Kazan, contributing to 5 goals in his 7 matches so far this campaign, already close to bettering his tally from 2021-22 in Russia. Here is our analysis of the remarkable rise of Khvicha Kvaratskhelia this season.

Where should Premier League clubs sign players?

Ahead of the start of the 2022-23 season, we endeavoured to answer the question – where should Premier League clubs sign players? In the process of doing our Premier League Transfer Tax study, we’ve identified a series of trends that existed within Premier League clubs last season, that can help to inform the business of teams moving forward – including questions of where to sign players. Here is our final piece to this four-part puzzle.

Premier League Transfer Tax (Part 2)

After examining fourteen Premier League sides, we are getting closer to the truth. Bundesliga Tax may very well be a real thing. Whether it’s the nature of players signing from the league in comparison to others, or simply something wrong with their ability to adapt, players coming over from Germany’s top flight have ranked consistently lower than players arriving from other leagues. Our data illustrates player performance on a range of statistical categories in and out of possession, whilst aiming to utilize our Role Continuity System in establishing important traits and characteristics specific to a player’s role.

Premier League Transfer Tax (Part 1)

It’s easy to use the eye test and conclude that players like Jadon Sancho and Timo Werner haven’t lived up to the hype. In a recent video, Tifo Football suggested that this phenomenon doesn’t just apply to Bundesliga clubs, but a range of leagues around the world. So with that, we aim to use data from the 2021-22 season to determine whether or not ‘Bundesliga Tax’ is a real phenomenon, and what leagues Premier League clubs should prioritize in sending their scouts to this summer. Here is our analysis of what we’re dubbing ‘EPL Transfer Tax’. In Part 1, we examine the top seven sides in the league based on points during the 2021-22 campaign, drawing conclusions around the business that ‘Top 7’ clubs conducted prior to the start of last season. In turn, this could inform decision making ahead of the 2022-23 season, and potentially the wider future at hand.

One thought on “Serie A Observations: Juventus Quick Take Tactical Analysis

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s